Monday, 17 August 2015

#inov8healthjsy, TEDx and IoD conclude the biggest issues are: health and education.



Earlier this year ciChange, with Digital Jersey and Jersey Business ran an event #inov8healthjsy which included speakers from Samsung, and the former CEO of Barts Hospital London and BT Health Tech. The day which comprised a breakfast briefing, invitation lunch and evening debate was hugely popular and a great success.

This not only opened the debate about Health Tech and Innovation, but also re-sparked interest in e-Government and the opportunities for Jersey. Samsung’s promotion of its Partnership Programme heightened also local interest of Jersey being a centre for Health Tech.

Very shortly after #inov8healthjsy I attended TEDxStPeterPort, ahead of running TEDxStHelier at little later in the year. Included in the speakers at TEDxStPeterPort was James Maskell of Primary Healthcare, and here too there was great excitement about the future.

The videos from TEDxStPeterPort are be available here.
http://tedxstpeterport.com/tedx-talks-2015/

Finally, following TEDxStHelier I discussed with Andrew Green and Justin Donovan some of the ideas discussed and how they may be applied to Jersey. This included using the idea of BlockBuilders and virtual reality to get community involvement in the design of the new hospital. It included discussion on the future of education, based on the excellent talks of Sir Ken Robinson , Rory Steel, Paul Dunn and others.

We also had the privilege of having Joe Dickinson Social Innovator of the Year as one of our speakers and a man whose idea is sought after by many of the leading businesses including IBM and Samsung.

The videos from TEDxStHelier will be available from September

The confluence of these things have shaped the thinking for TEDx in 2016 and I have outlined our plans on the TEDxStHelier website. We are thinking about combining the health and education as the theme “tomorrow’s world”. We already have some ideas for sponsorship and speakers and aim to turn what started as #inov8healthjsy into something quite spectacular for 2016.

http://www.tedxsthelier.com/tedx-2016/

So with all this coming together nicely I am delighted to see that the IoD’s annual Jersey Debate will be on the future of our health and education. The debate includes many of those involvest in#inov8healthjsy, including Paul White, senior consultant and former CEO of BT Health London, Barts and the London NHS Trust

The Jersey IoD Annual Debate, which ordinarily attracts an audience of over 500 people, takes place on Thursday 17 September 2015 at the RJA&HS from 4.45pm – 9.45pm and is open to all islanders, including IoD members, non-members and politicians. Places cost £80 per person, including a supper, whilst a table of 12 can also be booked via the IoD Jersey Branch Officer on 610799 or jedirector@localdial.com. Further information is available at www.iod.je, the IoD Group on LinkedIn and by following @iodjersey on Twitter.

I look forward to attending.

For those inspired by the IoD Annual Debate, or interested in TED Talks and TEDx with particular emphasis on health and education as the theme “tomorrow’s world” please get in contact and be part of the shaping and planning for 2016.

THE AUTHOR

Tim Rogers is an experienced Project and Change Leader. He is founder of www.ciChange.org and curator for www.TEDxStHelier.Com . He is Programme Manager for the commercialization of Jersey Harbours and Jersey Airport, and previously Operations Change and Sales Support for RBSI/NatWest, and Project Manager for the Incorporation of Jersey Post. He is also Commonwealth Triathlete and World Championships Rower with a passion for teaching and learning and is a Tutor/Mentor on the Chartered Management Institute courses. He is a Chartered Member of the British Computer Society, has an MBA (Management Consultancy) and is both a PRINCE2 and Change Management Practitioner.

Tim HJ Rogers
PRINCE2 - MBA (Consultancy) - APMG Change Practitioner
www.timhjrogers.com | Twitter @timhjrogers | Skype @timhjrogers | Mobile: 07797762051
Curator TEDxStHelier www.TEDxStHelier.com
Founder ciChange www.ciChange.org

Friday, 14 August 2015

Does a successful tribe need management? Or is it better without?


I have recently taken up climbing and although a complete novice I am enjoying it tremendously. I am also a member of the rowing club, triathlon club and canoe club and have always assumed that long-term success depends upon training, development, performance and growth. But those assumptions have been challenged. Could the opposite be true?

My reasoning

My thinking is based on the idea that members come and go and to be successful clubs and societies need to recruit, nurture, support, develop and say goodbye. Inevitably this means catering for a range of membership based on age (youth, juniors, seniors, veterans) and a range of talent (novice, intermediate, advanced, elite). The successful clubs and societies may have separate sections or sub-committees to manage the differing needs, expectations and challenges but overall having the right balance makes for a good community who have a blend of talent and experience to be able to help each-other.

Clearly a club of 3 members is unlikely achieve the above, and one of 3000 is likely to be far too big to be manageable. Most clubs and societies are like tribes and have their own cultures, rules, rituals and relationships and, like most tribes, work best when active membership is between 100 to 250 (See Link 1 below).

It is interesting to note that most people on Facebook have 150 friends, Linked-In assumes most people have < 500 connections. Most weddings apparently have 100 – 150 guests. There appears to be accepted boundaries for the size of a tribe and if membership goes beyond those boundaries we see splits and divisions. Notably there are so many people cycling in Jersey that we’d seen the number of bike clubs go from one to two, and then when each of them had more than 100 members then fragment into 5 separate clubs.

On the basis of the above, I had assumed that any successful clubs or societies would aspire to have between 100 to 250 members and structure itself to offer opportunities to all the ages and abilities of that membership, with just the right amount of organisation to manage the communication, activity and culture that holds it all together.

The counter-argument

Interestingly the counter-argument is a little more laissez faire and proposes that the best communities and bonds are formed when people are tenacious enough to pursue their interests without formal organisation, training, development, support etc.,

In relation to climbing bigger equals more people. There are many crowded climbing venues now in the world. Where people queue for routes; Litter, erosion & wear all become issues with greater numbers. Not to mention conflict.

It has been put to me that “People who are genuinely interested in climbing find their way to us; People with a drive and commitment to go climbing. Come to us and we support them as they learn. They are not trained or drilled. They take time to learn themselves, with our input and advice, and they do it well. The door to this community is open, always, to anyone who is genuinely motivated to make the effort. This effort sorts things out well for us. It reduces the casual have a go people dramatically”

This approach is seen as an apprenticeship, without the need for investing time and effort. Albeit that apprenticeship is not for the young because that way there is no need “…to cater to child protection…” and “... we don’t have to attend training or fulfil any other criteria…”

After years of routine, regiment and training this no rules, no responsibility, community is actually quite appealing.

My climbing counsellor has ridiculed my orthodox thinking and concluded “We like our climbing community, we like it small, strong, colourful and individualistic. We keep our rules down. Climbers have historically been a little rebellious, anti establishment, individualistic, independent. When you’re on the sharp end of a climb, that’s what it takes the ability to think for yourself to move and to take responsibility for your actions. These traits are something a little different from your normal swimming club for example. As such climbers are not organised or structured, they are little difficult to handle but they still get out there and have fun, all the time.”

A new perspective

I find this new perspective interesting because it relieves members of any ‘obligation’ to help others and instead pursues the “sink or swim” approach to natural selection. It inevitably achieves the aim of keeping the tribe manageable without the need for management and relies on talent and temperament rather than tutors and training. Without rules or regime success is a function of resilience.

Maybe more organisations should operate like this?

LINKS
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar%27s_number

THE AUTHOR

Tim Rogers is an experienced Project and Change Leader. He is founder of www.ciChange.org and curator for www.TEDxStHelier.Com . He is Programme Manager for the commercialization of Jersey Harbours and Jersey Airport, and previously Operations Change and Sales Support for RBSI/NatWest, and Project Manager for the Incorporation of Jersey Post. He is also Commonwealth Triathlete and World Championships Rower with a passion for teaching and learning and is a Tutor/Mentor on the Chartered Management Institute courses. He is a Chartered Member of the British Computer Society, has an MBA (Management Consultancy) and is both a PRINCE2 and Change Management Practitioner.

Tim HJ Rogers
PRINCE2 - MBA (Consultancy) - APMG Change Practitioner
www.timhjrogers.com | Twitter @timhjrogers | Skype @timhjrogers | Mobile: 07797762051
Curator TEDxStHelier www.TEDxStHelier.com
Founder ciChange www.ciChange.org




5 Critical Steps to Understanding Customers.


We are all encouraged to focus upon the customer. The customer is king we are told. But I remember a great quote which got me thinking: “120% of our income comes from 80% of our customers” The clear implication being that the remainder are loss making! So what should we do about this?


There is so much written about customers and services that I am either brave or foolish to venture any of my own thoughts on the subject, however it does interest me and in management, leadership and change knowing and understanding your customer is as important as it is in product sales or service delivery.

WHO IS OUR CUSTOMER?
Think: internal, external, chooser, user, consumer, funder,?

For many items there are many customers with different names: consumer; user; client and more. It can however be useful to think of them in terms of their function or role in the transaction. They may be providing the money; specifying the criteria; doing the procurement; using the product/service or responsible for the outputs and outcomes which depend on that product/service.

There is no clear rule whom you might best schmooze to secure a sale. It may be the specialist setting the specification, or the finance person in charge of the budget, or the manager in charge of the outputs or outcome or the operative using the product/service.

Bob Hope once said that you cannot satisfy all of the people all of the time, but the surest way to fail is to try. So on the basis every circumstance is different your first challenge must be to determine who is (are) the key people who have real impact or influence to your product/service.

WHAT DO THEY WANT / VALUE?
Think: speed, price, quality, friendly, efficient, accurate, design, credibility, trust?

If you succeed in your the first quest the next will be to establish what is important to them. There is no point in your product/service being cheap, if what they want is quality. There is no point in your product/service being quality, if what they want is speed. Indeed what they truly value may be nothing at all to do with the product/service but based on their relationship with you.

This needs careful thinking because getting what you offer and what they want aligned is the secret to success but misalignment could create problems or risk. Compromise can be a good thing, but if you are perfectly aligned then compromise is unnecessary. Consider your people, processes, and technology as well as your product/service when seeking alignment with what they want.

HOW DO WE CHECK/TEST?
Think: meetings; surveys; poll; intranet; helpdesk; complaints?

If you get this far you are doing well. However never assume that you have got it right. Check.

In LEAN-Start-Up the suggestion is that rather than go the whole hog and do something 100% and then find out you are 100% wrong, better to do small tests along the way to check you are heading in the right direction. The LEAN-Start-Up approach is to have a Minimal Viable Product, and through testing and evolution develop something based on customer feedback. This is far better than spending all your time and money to launch something that is a flop.

Not only will this approach improve product/service alignment with the customer, but the discussion and iteration is also likely to improve your understanding and relationship with the customer, and in so doing build loyalty and commitment.

WHAT/HOW SHOULD WE MEASURE?
Think: Charter; SLA; KPI; logging?

Measuring customer satisfaction is a huge topic and there are so many ways to achieve this. However I hope that it is obvious that understanding who the customer is, and what they value is a necessary pre-cursor to checking their satisfaction.

Satisfaction can be judged by repeat business or sales, by positive feedback or negative criticism. Increasingly businesses recognise the value of social media as a method of measuring satisfaction. It goes beyond the scope of this blog to explore every possibility. The key thing is to consider what is best for your product/service and/or relationship. Formal, informal, quantitative or qualitative.

WHAT/HOW SHOULD WE IMPROVE?
Think: Kaizan, LEAN, Business Process Reengineering, other changes?

The LEAN-Start-Up approach which effectively is based in PLAN > DO > CHECK > ACT cycle should not finish but continue through the life of the product/service and/or relationship. Things change and people, processes, and technology all need to be revisited to make sure that they continue to align with product/service and/or relationship.

IN SUMMARY

1. Who is our customer? Think: internal, external, chooser, user, consumer, funder,?
2. What do they want / value? Think: speed, price, quality, friendly, efficient, accurate, design, credibility, trust?
3. How do we check/test? Think: meetings; surveys; poll; intranet; helpdesk; complaints?
4. What/How should we measure? Think: Charter; SLA; KPI; logging?
5. What/How should we improve? Think: Kaizan, LEAN, Business Process Reengineering, other changes?


THE AUTHOR

Tim Rogers is an experienced Project and Change Leader. He is founder of www.ciChange.org and curator for www.TEDxStHelier.Com . He is Programme Manager for the commercialization of Jersey Harbours and Jersey Airport, and previously Operations Change and Sales Support for RBSI/NatWest, and Project Manager for the Incorporation of Jersey Post. He is also Commonwealth Triathlete and World Championships Rower with a passion for teaching and learning and is a Tutor/Mentor on the Chartered Management Institute courses. He is a Chartered Member of the British Computer Society, has an MBA (Management Consultancy) and is both a PRINCE2 and Change Management Practitioner.

Tim HJ Rogers
PRINCE2 - MBA (Consultancy) - APMG Change Practitioner
www.timhjrogers.com | Twitter @timhjrogers | Skype @timhjrogers | Mobile: 07797762051
Curator TEDxStHelier www.TEDxStHelier.com
Founder ciChange www.ciChange.org




Thursday, 13 August 2015

The difference between a task-force and a project creates significant behavioural issues.


Beware the difference between a task-force and a project. A project has a start-date, end-date, a budget and clear deliverables. However a task-force may go forever, use cash, and constantly find new things to do. This creates significant behavioural issues!


What is the difference?

Being a member of a project team puts people’s focus on the outcome or output of the project with a clear implication that success will come from completion on-time, on-budget, to-specification with lo-risk and hi-communication. The emphasis therefore is on getting to the end having met the criteria with the full knowledge that the team will dis-band thereafter. Relationships tend to be functional and based on the needs of the project.

Being a member of a task-force, is like being in a club where within boundaries you can decide the rules, outcome or output. A task-force to “improve x” can go forever because anything and everything can be improved. The relationship patterns are different and follow the recognised stages of forming, storming, norming and performing. Notably however relationship becomes a bigger factor in pursuit of longevity and in the interests of the members. This is potentially different from the potential tension or short-term friction which is tolerated in a project in pursuit of an end-point.

What is the problem?

We are all familiar with projects that seem to go forever: they are never quite finished; there is always more to do. These have become akin to a task force which rather than conclude and disband will perpetuate the membership as a pastime more focussed on belonging than delivering. People will boast about their membership rather than their delivery.

Projects are not without their challenges: pushing people hard for big goals in ambitious time-scales can be wearing, divisive and create friction and conflict which is only manageable because the challenge is exciting and rewarding and the pain is generally short, with a clear end in sight.

What is the best approach?

I am not sure that you can take the best of both worlds and apply since this compromise may fail the needs of both task-force and projects. Instead I would advocate being clear on which approach is best for the matter at hand. These are my thoughts.

1. If the intention is towards achieving a clearly defined goal, outcome or output then a project approach may be better.
2. If the intention is towards improvement or change then a task-force approach may be better since both improvement and change are constant and continuous processes.
3. To avoid a task-force becoming a “country club” there should be some parameters akin to project management. For example clear objectives for the period ahead, and changing membership as a catalyst for new ideas and a drive for completing tasks before the end of tenure.
4. To avoid a project becoming wearing, divisive and creating friction put in some key milestones and celebrate successes along the way. Use a “thank you” or a milestone party as a pressure release valve for social re-engagement.

Suggestions, feedback and alternative views are very welcome.

The Author

Tim Rogers is an experienced Project and Change Leader. He is founder of www.ciChange.org and curator for www.TEDxStHelier.Com . He is Programme Manager for the commercialization of Jersey Harbours and Jersey Airport, and previously Operations Change and Sales Support for RBSI/NatWest, and Project Manager for the Incorporation of Jersey Post. He is also Commonwealth Triathlete and World Championships Rower with a passion for teaching and learning and is a Tutor/Mentor on the Chartered Management Institute courses. He is a Chartered Member of the British Computer Society, has an MBA (Management Consultancy) and is both a PRINCE2 and Change Management Practitioner.

Tim HJ Rogers
PRINCE2 - MBA (Consultancy) - APMG Change Practitioner
www.timhjrogers.com | Twitter @timhjrogers | Skype @timhjrogers | Mobile: 07797762051
Curator TEDxStHelier www.TEDxStHelier.com
Founder ciChange www.ciChange.org

Wednesday, 12 August 2015

When is routine a good thing, and when is it dysfunctional?



When is routine a good thing, and when is it dysfunctional?

Routine can be a good thing. People are creatures of habit and “You are what you repeatedly do” as the saying goes. To add weight to this theoretical benefit of repetition “success is a journey not a destination”. However trapped in “we’ve always done it this way” and repeating cycles, roles, circumstances can constrain us. Madness is “expecting change, yet doing the same things”

My story

I am a creature of routine: as a triathlete I have my training routine; at work I have my daily routine and at home I have a domestic routine. Like everybody else it makes my life predictable and manageable, but I do like deviations, holidays, distractions and occasional surprises.

However with all these things we need to keep the objective in mind and be flexible. If I am training for a long-distance triathlon and I feel really tired, maybe that day should be a rest-day. If I am at work and a crisis happens, then maybe I need to re-prioritise and reschedule a bit. What is important is the outcome, not the process and flexibility along the way is essential.

Now this may all be very obvious. Indeed everything I have ever experienced in projects, management and change is obvious. So guess my surprise when this morning when driving to work after significant rain and much flooding I saw some contract gardeners watering the sodden flower beds along the side of the road.

What is the problem here?

I realise it is August and they possibly had scheduled Tuesday to water the flowers. However shouldn’t common sense kick-in and suggest that there may be other things of higher priority now that the circumstances have changed? Watering the plants after flooding just isn’t adding value to the outcome is it?

What lessons can we learn?

Of course this probably isn’t the fault of the gardener. This is the fault of systems and management which operate unthinkingly and without the flexibility to respond to circumstances. What do we need to do to make systems and management work better?

1. Manage the outcomes, not the tasks.
2. Allow people flexibility to achieve the outcomes according to circumstance.
3. Balance routine with random to accommodate both to best effect


THE AUTHOR

Tim Rogers is an experienced Project and Change Leader. He is founder of www.ciChange.org and curator for www.TEDxStHelier.Com . He is Programme Manager for the commercialization of Jersey Harbours and Jersey Airport, and previously Operations Change and Sales Support for RBSI/NatWest, and Project Manager for the Incorporation of Jersey Post. He is also Commonwealth Triathlete and World Championships Rower with a passion for teaching and learning and is a Tutor/Mentor on the Chartered Management Institute courses. He is a Chartered Member of the British Computer Society, has an MBA (Management Consultancy) and is both a PRINCE2 and Change Management Practitioner.

Tim HJ Rogers
PRINCE2 - MBA (Consultancy) - APMG Change Practitioner
www.timhjrogers.com | Twitter @timhjrogers | Skype @timhjrogers | Mobile: 07797762051
Curator TEDxStHelier www.TEDxStHelier.com
Founder ciChange www.ciChange.org

Friday, 17 July 2015

Digital Jersey and Jersey Business support for #Solopreneursjsy


In the #solopreneursjsy  workshop at Chamber of Commerce there was discussion about what support and services could be provided by Digital Jersey and Jersey Business to help start-ups, independents, entrepreneurs and solopreneurs.

Digital Jersey and Jersey Business have worked together to produce this handy graphic and are very happy to run a lunchtime discussion about what Digital Jersey and Jersey Business can do to help start-ups, independents, entrepreneurs and solopreneurs.

We feel that this is best timed for September to avoid the holiday period and will shortly publicise an Eventbrite invitation to anyone who is interested in this follow-up


Tim HJ Rogers
Founder / Curator ciChange
Mob 07797762051 | Skype timhjrogers
Web: cichange.org | Twitter: @cichange

Tuesday, 7 July 2015

SoJ LEAN Programme Conference


BACKROUND

The States of Jersey (SoJ) has embraced LEAN as one of the components to help it become more efficient and effective. Their LEAN programme, combined with government reform and a host of other initiatives to down-size and get into shape, will help toward both improving customer services, reducing costs and meeting the challenge of the £120m+ funding “black hole”

Their programme has been on-going for about 2 years, and I (and about 200 others) went along to their conference to understand more about their programme and the ideas, opportunities and lessons from others who have been using LEAN (or similar) initiatives in their businesses.

It was particularly useful to see a mix from Jersey and the UK, and hear different experiences of public and private sector about the benefits and challenges of LEAN (or similar) initiatives.

SUMMARY THOUGHTS

Blogs are seldom read if they are long so at the risk of missing some key points, and over simplification of brilliant presentations and insightful experiences I will bullet-list my thoughts against each agenda item.


240830 REGISTRATION AND COFFEE IN THE CONFERENCE FOYER

• It was interesting that circa 200 people attended of the 7000+ workforce
• I noted that 700 “yellow belts” have been trained in LEAN and 80 “green belts”

0900 - 1015 OPENING PLENARY SESSION, INTRODUCTIONS, WELCOME ADDRESS AND KEY NOTE SPEECH

The opening session was good and the speaker about LEAN in HM Courts was a valuable case study. Starting circa 1999/2000 they had successes and set-backs and many lessons along the way. What is important is that SoJ learn and tailor their approach so as not to take as long as the pioneers, but instead be more agile and targeted with greatest emphasis on those areas which were important in hindsight:
1) LEAN is about people, thinking and culture not tools and processes
2) Without leadership commitment progress will be slow
3) Shallow and wide approaches do not work
4) Engage with the customer to ensure you are delivering value for THEM

1045 - 1145 LEARNING SESSION 1,

There were four sessions to choose from and I selected to see my old colleagues at Royal Bank of Scotland International RBSI. I used Work-Out (based on GE & Jack Welch approach to LEAN / Six Sigma) and it was interesting to see how RBSI have developed since 2000. Their programme is more focussed on people and culture development than strict efficiencies (cutting head-count). It was noted that the more aggressive, numbers-based approach in the UK has faltered somewhat, whereas the skills approach in the Channel Islands has enjoyed greater success. The skills approach is not however a soft approach. Those who has struggled with ownership and responsibility for processes and performance have exited the business. Success seems significantly linked to daily dialogue with staff about everyday issues. The “little and often” approach of listening, gathering and sharing ideas creates more engagement, understanding and commitment than consultant driven change which losses momentum quickly if not co-created with the staff. The RBSI approach does appear to be centred around improvement in customer processes: opening accounts, sending emails, transferring information and less about saving chunks of money. However the reduction in waste, time and money is a great by-product to improved customer service. Their recipe requires the following ingredients…
• Customer
• Organisation and Skills
• Efficient Processes
• Mind-set and Behaviours
• Performance

Note that these are built into people’s performance and appraisal criteria. This is not something to do on a Friday if you have time. There is real focus (and peer pressure) to do this right, and significant support and tools to help managers manage better.

I was particularly impressed by the answer about Standard Operational Procedures (SOPs). I queried whether simplified one-size fits all SOPs might be a blinkered approach to complex issues. In the public sector in particular social needs of housing, health, safety, may have implications for many departments and often fall through the cracks, ultimately failing the customer. RBSI came back with a response that would have pleased LEAN critic John Seddon: In those situations of high complexity you need to use people not processes to solve the problem, and you need to “manage the variation” with empathy and understanding.

1150 - 1245 LEARNING SESSION 2,

In the second session I chose to attend David Brunt’s session, speaking for the Lean Enterprise Academy (www.leanuk.org). This again emphasised that LEAN (or similar) initiatives are about thinking and culture and used a case study to illustrate how 10 random audience members could each understand the problem differently. David went on to suggest that if each scenario can trigger 10 different initiatives it would be easy to be over-run with projects. He counselled that LEAN should not be about “yellow belts” and “green belts” and echoed another speaker that it isn’t about tools like 5S and 8W, but instead about culture and capability rather than 1000 projects.

1345 - 1445 LEARNING SESSION 3,

In the third session we were shown a time-lapse film of a car service, with the camera following the mechanics as they did their tasks. Note was made of tasks that added value (servicing the car) and tasks that did not add value (filling in forms, collecting parts, moving vehicles). Emphasis was on the real every-day practical tasks and the case study showed that after 4 or 5 iterations of the process they managed to complete a service that used to take 60 minutes in just 17. The key issue however was not the time (and money) saved, but how the learning and improvement was achieved. It was done with a cheap video camera, some guys with clip boards and lots of suggestions happening “live” on real customer cars in a real every-day situation (not at a desk, not in a lab).

1450 - 1545 LEARNING SESSION 4,

For my last session I learned about RR Donnelly (the people who print Harry Potter books, as well as many, many other things). Hear the lessons and ideas were many, but the take-away message was….
• Go-see
• Ask
• Show respect

1615 - 1700 CLOSING PLENARY SESSION, Q&A SESSSION WITH SPEAKERS AND CLOSING SPEECH

SoJ took solace that all those that had presented had taken years to get where they are today and LEAN is not going to be a quick-fix. My view however is that with the benefit of hindsight and the expertise of those presenting at the conference SoJ has an opportunity to do twice the performance in half the time.

I have no doubt that LEAN presents some great opportunities, but the lessons are clear: it depends on leadership, communication and culture.

REFLECTION AND POST-SCRIPT

It may be interesting to consider LEAN in the contact of an OST view of organisation (single, defined Objective, Strategy based on how you will achieve the O and Tactics that are the day-to-day manifestation of that Strategy or Strategies)

It may be interesting to consider where LEAN fits in? Is it O, S or T? Will lean be a T-tactic to meeting the challenge of the £120m+ funding “black hole” or an S-strategy as “the way we do things around here” and therefore embedded into every product, service and component of strategy.

Instinctively what it should not be is an O-objective: because surely the objective is about “public services” and not about the means of delivery. Doubtless this will become clearer as the LEAN programme emerges from its cradle and finds its feet.

What is undoubted is the potential.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This posting has been updated and I am grateful for the insight and contribution from a couple of people who reviewed the initial version. Just like LEAN, things can be improved by getting different perspectives and asking opinion and I am grateful for the suggested enhancements.

MORE INFORMATION

If you would like more information about this conference, or any of the significant amount of material that I have both in praise and cautionary about LEAN please contact timhjrogers@cichange.org

THE AUTHOR

Tim Rogers is an experienced Project and Change Leader. He is founder of www.ciChange.org and curator for www.TEDxStHelier.Com . He is Programme Manager for the commercialization of Jersey Harbours and Jersey Airport, and previously Operations Change and Sales Support for RBSI/NatWest, and Project Manager for the Incorporation of Jersey Post. He is also Commonwealth Triathlete and World Championships Rower with a passion for teaching and learning and is a Tutor/Mentor on the Chartered Management Institute courses. He is a Chartered Member of the British Computer Society, has an MBA (Management Consultancy) and is both a PRINCE2 and Change Management Practitioner.

Email: TimHJRogers@cihange.org
Mob: 07797762051 | Twitter @timhjrogers | Skype timhjrogers



CULTURE OR DATA – WHICH IS MORE IMPORTANT?

CULTURE OR DATA – WHICH IS MORE IMPORTANT? In a previous posting I noted that the book The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improb...