Sunday, 25 August 2013

Components of Change – Competence OR Learning by Doing – Lessons from a Brain Surgeon



Components of Change – Competence  OR Learning by Doing – Lessons from a Brain Surgeon

Summary: There is a lot to be said for action learning, or learning by doing. Confucius said I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand. However this should not become a cheap alternative to a professional approach based on  ‘.. we will work it out as we go along..’ Red Adair said “If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur.”



As more businesses embark on change and seek to engage their staff they will seek to combine the two and utilise to staff to effect the change. There is a logic to this, and change without staff engagement will not work. However the assumption that the existing staff can deliver effective change without tools, training, support and guidance is misplaced.  Furthermore the idea that this might save, time, money or improve morale is misguided.

Old habits die hard and whilst staff may wear new badges, speak the new lingo, and ostensibly support change the underlying processes and behaviours seldom change because they are habitual, engrained and familiar. Indeed most change reverts back to the old ways (possibly with new labels) within 9 months. This is true of fitness campaigns, weight loss or business change which all take time, and money and often fail to deliver the desired results.

Aside from the fact that change from within is a bit like turkey’s voting for Christmas, if your current people, process or technology needs to change then it is unlikely that the existing people, process or technology is able to change without some intervention.
                                         


Leaders often make the mistake of thinking vision, mission and values are enough to transform people, process or technology. However that’s not how we educate in our schools or train our surgeons, or teach drivers, so why do people believe it should work in our organisations.

Action Learning or Learning by Doing needs to be coached, supported, and guided. It needs to nurture confidence and create competence. Courses or Consultants cannot on their own deliver organisational change, but neither can in-house staff. What is required is a managed approach which like driving lessons provides the tools and tuition, but also some hands-on experience for the people to master the process and technology.

The right balance is essential since without it the organisation may simply waste time, money and morale.

About the Author
Tim HJ Rogers is a project and change leader with a strong background in Business (Finance, Government & Commerce) and Sport (Triathlon & Rowing)  See http://www.timhjrogers.com/
Contact
TimHJRogers@cichange.org See also http://www.cichange.org

No comments:

Post a Comment

CULTURE OR DATA – WHICH IS MORE IMPORTANT?

CULTURE OR DATA – WHICH IS MORE IMPORTANT? In a previous posting I noted that the book The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improb...