Monday 20 May 2013

The problem with Kotter’s 8 Steps = Implementation



 The problem with Kotter’s 8 Steps = Implementation

I recently blogged about some changes in the Jersey Rowing Club which provide useful lessons for Change Management in business (link below) A valued reply suggested John P. Kotter's book - "Leading Change" has an 8 step process which describes many of the Club's findings.


The problem with Kotter’s 8 Steps is that they don’t consider the challenge of implementation.

Kotter's eight step change model can be summarised as:

1.       Increase urgency - inspire people to move, make objectives real and relevant.
2.       Build the guiding team - get the right people in place with the right emotional commitment, and the right mix of skills and levels.
3.       Get the vision right - get the team to establish a simple vision and strategy, focus on emotional and creative aspects necessary to drive service and efficiency.
4.       Communicate for buy-in - Involve as many people as possible, communicate the essentials, simply, and to appeal and respond to people's needs. De-clutter communications - make technology work for you rather than against.
5.       Empower action - Remove obstacles, enable constructive feedback and lots of support from leaders - reward and recognise progress and achievements.
6.       Create short-term wins - Set aims that are easy to achieve - in bite-size chunks. Manageable numbers of initiatives. Finish current stages before starting new ones.
7.       Don't let up - Foster and encourage determination and persistence - ongoing change - encourage ongoing progress reporting - highlight achieved and future milestones.
8.       Make change stick - Reinforce the value of successful change via recruitment, promotion, new change leaders. Weave change into culture.

Steps 1 to 4 are about mobilising and motivating people. Steps 7 and 8 are about seeing the changes through and keeping momentum. Only steps 5 and 6 suggest any action and neither propose what that action should be, only that there needs to be some.

There is a big difference between having a time-table and having action. Kotters’ structure is excellent and world famous, but it is also generic. It does address the Why (No1 Urgency) and How (No2 Guiding Team) but frankly empowering people to do something is not going to bring change unless you are clear on which people and what something: who; what; when; where.

For this reason I think it is important to share examples of successful change which include this detail. If you would like to share examples of who; what; when; where you have seen change please contact me or contribute to this blog.

Tim Rogers

Founder ciChange
timrogers@ciChange.org
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/CI-Change-4301853
ciChange seminar and networking events for 2013 sponsored by Total Solutions Group http://www.tsgi.co/

No comments:

Post a Comment

CULTURE OR DATA – WHICH IS MORE IMPORTANT?

CULTURE OR DATA – WHICH IS MORE IMPORTANT? In a previous posting I noted that the book The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improb...