Saturday, 1 November 2014

Don’t use structure to solve culture

Don’t use structure to solve culture

I recently attended a great workshop on projects and programme management by the people AtTask  (Link 1) included in the workshop was an excellent presentation by `Stephen Carver (Link 2)

Stephen worked on projects in the oil business before moving on to work at Virgin before working directly for a global CEO as head of Project & Programme Management Strategy. He is an Honorary Fellow of the Association of Project Management (more info at Link 2)

Stephen was so prolific with his ideas I anticipate at least four or five blogs arising from some of the things he shared and the thinking that it inspired. Here is my first.

Stephen talked about 3 types complexity which effect projects and programmes
1.      Structural complexity – eg the complexity of many components, aspects, factors 
2.      emergent - eg working in changing environments, or with new circumstances
3.      socio-political – eg the complexity of people, politics, culture, motivation, politicians

I have long said that Project management is about dealing with uncertainty and Leadership is about delivering clarity. So we recognise and agree the challenges.

There are 5 levels of project management capability and most organisations over-rate their ability…
1) chaos – this is no coordination, control, structure and success is random or luck
2) patchwork –  project success is personality driven rather than structured and systematic
3) dictatorship / lip-service – there are tools, templates and processes, that some follow
4) flexible methodology –right things done in the right way, without being too prescriptive
5) instinctive – co-ordination, communication and collaboration are the natural order

Below (right at the bottom!) I have outlined 7 questions to help you asses the 5 levels of project management.

What is interesting is levels 1, 2 & 3 are about having the right structure whereas 3, 4 & 5 are about managing emergent & socio-political issues which cannot be done by formula.
When (70%?!) of projects go wrong the tendency is to fix the structure (task, budget, control) not address the problem which is emergent& socio-political e.g. people, politics, mood, culture, WIIFM

I have previously said that giving people shoes and a plan doesn't make them a marathon runner. Similarly structure (Tools, Templates, Training, Techniques) doesn't guarantee success. So what does? Well the answer to that will be in my next blog.

In the meantime, consider this….

As a Project Manager I understand tasks and products, but as a Change Leader I appreciate that tasks are just a manifestation of behaviour and products are ostensibly a means of outcome (eg happiness) . All too often we manage the tasks and products, but fail the behaviour and outcome with the result we don’t achieve our goal (eg happiness, security, confidence etc.) Success comes from mentoring and coaching and the tool is language.

LINKS

About AtTask

About Stephen Carver

Impact of words, tone & body language = 7%-38%-55% BUT rule is mis-understood http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Mehrabian

ciCHANGE FEEDBACK

Thanks to Rob Quinlan and Alexsis Wintour for their feedback on the initial draft of this Blog.

Please share your thoughts either directly by email or via Social Media
Twitter @ciChange https://twitter.com/CIChange

ciChange is sponsored by Total Solutions Group http://www.tsgi.co/

THE AUTHOR

Tim Rogers is an experienced Project and Change Leader. He is founder of www.ciChange.org and curator for www.TEDxStHelier.Com . He is Programme Manager for the commercialization of Jersey Harbours and Jersey Airport. He is also Commonwealth Triathlete and World Championships Rower with a passion for teaching and learning and is a Tutor/Mentor on the Chartered Management Institute courses.

Mob: 07797762051 | Twitter @timhjrogers | Skype timhjrogers 

SAMPLE QUESTIONNAIRE

Question 1 - Management Control
1.     Level1 Project management is inconsistent and managed according to individual preferences.
2.     Level2 There are some experts on key projects.
3.     Level3 There is a defined approach and it is applied in all projects by capable staff
4.     Level4 Project a key tool for the delivery of change. Focus is on measurement and analysis of performance.
5.     Level5 Project management as the optimal approach to change delivery is organization-wide.

Question 2 -  Benefits Management
1.     Level1 Benefits can be differentiated from project outputs.
2.     Level2 Benefits are recognized as an element within project business cases.
3.     Level3 There is a centrally managed and consistent framework for defining and tracking the realization of benefits from project outputs.
4.     Level4 There is a focus on delivery of business performance from project outputs.
5.     Level5 Benefits and approach to change is assessed as part of the development of  organizational strategy.

Question 3 -  Financial Management
1.     Level1 There is little or no financial control at project level. There is a lack of accountability and monitoring of project expenditure.
2.     Level2 Project business cases are produced in various forms. Overall cost of the project is not monitored or fully accounted for.
3.     Level3 There are centrally established standards for the preparation of business cases. Project managers monitor costs and expenditure in accordance with organizational guidelines and procedures.
4.     Level4 The organization is able to prioritize investment opportunities effectively in relation to the availability of funds and other resources.
5.     Level5 Project financial controls are fully integrated with those of the organization.. There is evidence of continual improvement.

 Question 4 - Stakeholder Engagement
1.     Level1 Stakeholder engagement and communication is rarely used by projects
2.     Level2 Projects will be communicated to stakeholders, but this is linked more to the personal initiative of project managers than to a structured approach
3.     Level3 There is a centrally managed and consistent approach to stakeholder engagement and communications used by all projects.
4.     Level4 Sophisticated techniques are used to analyse and engage the project stakeholder environment.
5.     Level5 Communications are being optimized from extensive knowledge of the project stakeholder environment, to enable the projects to achieve their objectives.

Question 5 - Risk Management
1.     Level1 There is minimal evidence of risk management being used
2.     Level2 Risk management is recognized and used on projects, but these are inconsistent
3.     Level3 Project risk management is based on a defined process
4.     Level4 There is evidence of opportunity management and management of risk aggregation.
5.     Level5 Risk management is embedded in the organizational culture and underpins all decision-making within projects.

 Question 6 - Organisational Governance
1.     Level1 Some informal governance of projects exists. Roles are unlikely to be formally defined.
2.     Level2 Project management from an organizational perspective is beginning to take shape but with ad hoc controls and no clear strategic control. Roles and responsibilities will be inconsistent, as will reporting lines.
3.     Level3 Centrally defined organizational controls are applied consistently to all projects, with decision-making structures in place.
4.     Level4 Clearly aligned project decision-making processes integrate with broader organizational governance.
5.     Level5 The governance arrangements for projects are a core aspect of organizational control, with demonstrable reporting lines to Executive Board level



Question 7 - Resource Management
1.     Level1 There is some recognition within the organization of the need to manage resources effectively but little evidence of resource acquisition, planning or management.
2.     Level2 Resources are being deployed across the organization and individual projects have an approach to resource acquisition, planning or management. However, there is little evidence of consistency of approach.
3.     Level3 The organization has a centrally defined and adopted set of procedures and management processes for acquiring, planning and managing project resources.
4.     Level4 Resource management for projects is considered at a strategic level within the organization. There is evidence of resource capacity management, through capacity planning, in order to meet project delivery needs.
5.     Level5 Resources are deployed optimally. There is clear evidence of load balancing and the effective use of both internal and external resources across projects.


No comments:

Post a Comment

CULTURE OR DATA – WHICH IS MORE IMPORTANT?

CULTURE OR DATA – WHICH IS MORE IMPORTANT? In a previous posting I noted that the book The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improb...